The events of last week in our first branch of government - an absence of 61% of Congress and the forgiveness of our trespasses a congressman reminds us and suggests that we live in country where you can easily and formal and may exculpate a rapist, a murderer or a scammer without pause and with total conviction to plead guilty to state that credit for such acts performed by inexperienced criminal. We are witnessing an act for the most corrupt and immoral, that coming from an institution to monitor and issue laws, only tells us that this decision is not nothing but a "new law" of our great jaguars. A "law" which exempts from guilt and any criminal penalties that simply apologize and accept their crimes may be relieved of paying for their crimes and continue their normal and happy life (as the great representative of Junín now may continue questioning and inspecting without morals or remorse).
But our children is an example for the delay, failure and laziness?. Why if we talk about this subject, similarly, the Congress is the institution where the left and right make these mistakes. When we refer to House of Congress (from the Latin meaning plenus full, full), we refer to the 120 elected parliamentarians, and the day of the election of two important issues were only 47 of them (39%), we wonder: Is fair that those 73 missing are paid their full salary?, these votes will have been covered by Parliament itself, is this legal?. Was it legal that Congressman Pando has been released through the absences approved Fujimori?
Although the charges raised by the Standing Committee did not foresee that the actions of the parliamentary set up, too, Collusion crimes and embezzlement, was essential to the fight against corruption that the Congress gave a clear signal of commitment and supported the prosecution of the legislature for the crime of Forgery Generic. He
all so precise, although the ONA (National Anti-Corruption Bureau), states that the evidence of the responsibility of Ricardo Pando, in addition to the aforementioned crimes and the identification he made at the plenary session, called for a clear and forceful response National Parliament.
Failure to approve the constitutional complaint against Congressman Ricardo Pando sets a dangerous precedent in the fight against corruption and impunity in Peru. Similarly denotes a macho inclination of Congress, to be punished and forgiven ladies Pando (perhaps to show that women are more corrupt?). Therefore, we demand an immediate correction of the Congress and regret the attitude of the congressmen who voted against the indictment, abstained or did not participate in the session. Pando Congressman should receive the same treatment given to the parliamentary Canchaya and Benites for the commission of a crime similar.
But our children is an example for the delay, failure and laziness?. Why if we talk about this subject, similarly, the Congress is the institution where the left and right make these mistakes. When we refer to House of Congress (from the Latin meaning plenus full, full), we refer to the 120 elected parliamentarians, and the day of the election of two important issues were only 47 of them (39%), we wonder: Is fair that those 73 missing are paid their full salary?, these votes will have been covered by Parliament itself, is this legal?. Was it legal that Congressman Pando has been released through the absences approved Fujimori?
Although the charges raised by the Standing Committee did not foresee that the actions of the parliamentary set up, too, Collusion crimes and embezzlement, was essential to the fight against corruption that the Congress gave a clear signal of commitment and supported the prosecution of the legislature for the crime of Forgery Generic. He
all so precise, although the ONA (National Anti-Corruption Bureau), states that the evidence of the responsibility of Ricardo Pando, in addition to the aforementioned crimes and the identification he made at the plenary session, called for a clear and forceful response National Parliament.
Failure to approve the constitutional complaint against Congressman Ricardo Pando sets a dangerous precedent in the fight against corruption and impunity in Peru. Similarly denotes a macho inclination of Congress, to be punished and forgiven ladies Pando (perhaps to show that women are more corrupt?). Therefore, we demand an immediate correction of the Congress and regret the attitude of the congressmen who voted against the indictment, abstained or did not participate in the session. Pando Congressman should receive the same treatment given to the parliamentary Canchaya and Benites for the commission of a crime similar.
0 comments:
Post a Comment